Richard Willis's Blog

First for local news and first for comment

Rank Labour Hypocrisy

Anyone following the Reading political scene or Reading media will know about the problems that have been experienced with the Shinfield Road traffic scheme. Since the traffic lights were switched on there have been increased delays, partly resulting from initial problems with the lights themselves and partly from continued works being undertaken in the area.

As I have highlighted before, this was a scheme I inherited from Labour, who had backed it to the hilt and refused almost all requests for changes made by opposition Councillors. I experienced that personally when I submitted a list of requested changes last year, only to be told that all but one would not be implemented. Over a period of two years Labour ignored almost all requests to reconsider aspects of the scheme and the then Labour Cabinet repeatedly voted unanimously for the scheme. When a small number of local residents began to raise objections with me and the ward Councillors it was far too late to achieve the major changes they wanted.

I have already announced a compehensive review of the scheme including the traffic-lighted junctions in six months time, with the promise that if congestion has worsened we will look to take the lights out. In the mean time I have instituted an immediate review of all aspects of the scheme to investigate what might be done to improve the flow of traffic. This has to be done affordably, legally and safely.

Since this was Labour’s scheme and they were so keen to dismiss suggestions for changes I was amazed today to receive a copy of a Press Release issued in the name of Labour’s three Whitley Ward Councillors. It reads as follows:

Shinfield Road improvement scheme: “We can’t go on like this”

Whitley’s three Labour councillors have said they want a review of the Shinfield Road traffic scheme if things have not improved within two weeks. Officials have said that the full implementation is only just starting and needs time to settle in, and Reading Borough Council’s lead councillor says there will be a review in six months.

But the councillors for Whitley say this is not good enough. They say that the hold ups to traffic are unacceptable and more traffic is now using residential roads in south Reading to avoid the bottleneck. They say six months is far too long to wait to see if the scheme will work.

In a joint statement, Labour councillors for Whitley, Rachel Eden, Jim Hanley and Mike Orton said,

“We share the concerns being put to us by local residents in our area. The Shinfield Road scheme is clogging up cars and buses alike.  As local councillors representing south Reading we are experiencing the problems ourselves and are having them reported to us daily. We can’t go on like this.

“Officials say that it is only just being implemented fully and needs time to settle down. The Lead councillor for transport has promised a review in six months. This is not good enough. We are monitoring the situation closely and if things have not improved significantly within the next two weeks we will be demanding a full review and reconsideration of this scheme.

“In the meantime, people can contact us directly to report problems and we will continue to follow up any comments.” 

These three Labour Councillors have ignored the fact that when the scheme was first proposed ALL of the Church ward Councillors were Labour and also that one of their number (Orton) was a Cabinet member who was jointly responsible for the original Shinfield Road scheme. Their call for a review in two week’s time also contradicts the statements of their own Group Transport Spokesman Cllr Tony Page, who only a week ago derided those calling for an immediate review of the traffic lights and agreed that the works should be finished and the scheme settle down before it is reviewed. Do they not speak to each other now that they are in opposition?

I perfectly accept that individuals are entitled to their views and I am very aware that many people are extremely unhappy with Labour’s changes on the Shinfield Road but the press release from the three Whitley Labour Councillors is rank hypocrisy and an attempt to jump on a bandwagon. I think that most people will treat this naked opportunism with the contempt it deserves.  It is also worth re-reading Cllr Tony Page’s answer to the petition presented at the 26 January Council meeting.

I am encouraged by the emails I have received from many people who have welcomed what I and my Conservative and Lib Dem colleagues are doing to unpick Labour’s disastrous transport legacy. More announcements will follow shortly.

September 20, 2010 - Posted by | Local

21 Comments »

  1. Richard,
    My own experience of this scheme is that it is a mess.
    It has been poorly considered, designed & implemented. On a Sunday mid-afternoon driving back into Reading I sat watching the lights less than a 100 yards away, change through 5 sequences, while the road was blocked by cars turning trying to turn right. Others were frustrated trying to get out of the small business area.
    If there had been a bus at peak commuter time goodness only knows what it would be like.
    Why not, through your own leadership, decide to address this issue sooner rather than later.

    Comment by Tony Jones (Independent) | September 20, 2010 | Reply

    • Tony – you will know from your own time in office that you cannot always announce what you want, when you want. There are processes to go through and ducks to be got in a row in order that expectations are not falsely to be raised only to be dashed later, not to mention financial implications!

      As soon as I am in a position to make further announcements I will do so.

      Comment by Richard Willis | September 20, 2010 | Reply

      • Richard, well done for bringing forward the review and for the intermediate actions. While I applaud your initiative in removing many of the raffic lights, perhaps its just time to stop this constant fiddling about with Reading’s road system for a while.

        Comment by Tony Jones (Independent) | September 28, 2010

  2. The immediate answer to the problem is a pot of white paint and some traffic light covering bags.
    At least that would allow traffic to move !
    Carriageway re-widening could then take place as soon as practicable in order to facilitate space for vehicles to wait in while turning right.
    Its not rocket science!

    Comment by Howard Thomas | September 21, 2010 | Reply

    • And in the mean time what about the many pedestrians that use the area? You would have created two dangerous junctions configured for traffic lights but with no pedestrian crossings or roundabouts!!

      Where would you suggest the money came from to widen the carriageway etc?

      That is the difference between throwaway criticism and real decision making. What you propose is also probably illegal!

      When I do announce a way forward it will be properly worked through and costed.

      Comment by Richard Willis | September 21, 2010 | Reply

  3. Do the Whitley councillors think we’re all thick? First they lied about the old Avenue site housing: they said it was cancelled – WRONG! Now suddenly they are pretending they are listening to us: after it was they themselves and their administration who instigated the Shinfield roads nightmare traffic lights having – you guessed it – not listened to local opposition!

    Comment by Tracy Clark | September 21, 2010 | Reply

  4. Less handwringing please. Your’e in charge now – sort it.

    Comment by Phil the Greek | September 21, 2010 | Reply

  5. Hi Richard,

    Many thanks for the detailed & informative post. Having read it I am encouraged that the matter is being looked into in an even handed and sensible way, unlike the way it appears to have been originally planned.

    Thanks also for linking to Tony Page’s response to the petition. I hadn’t read it before and it just underlines how blinkered the previous Labour administration was about traffic light schemes despite it being obvious to everyone who uses the road that this would be a disaster.

    Thanks,

    Ed

    Comment by Ed | September 21, 2010 | Reply

    • Thanks Ed. It is nice to have a constructive comment!

      Comment by Richard Willis | September 21, 2010 | Reply

  6. Cllr …… the white paint would be to paint the roundabout markings !!
    Pedestrian crossings are just about the only thing that needed doing to that section of road, but I did notice that during the works they were left with absolutely no crossing facility , and traffic (even on the reduced carriageway) was much less congested than when the lights were turned on.
    When it comes to decision making, the ball is in your court, you could delight many thousands of people accross the town by taking prompt action, it is your call.
    The carriageway needs to be re-widened. At the moment any vehicle wishing to make a manouvre like a right turn is stopping all the vehicles behind it because there is not enough room in the centre of the road to wait in.
    Most people I speak to are simply avoiding the area.If enough people do that the congestion will ‘calm down’ , but quite obviously will increase traffic elsewhere, including local residential streets.
    You might pay particular attension to reports of emergency vehicles struggling to get through !
    Yes, alterations will cost money. Yes , it will have to be costed, but timescale is important.
    My suggestion is that the sooner this is done the better

    Comment by Howard Thomas | September 21, 2010 | Reply

  7. I was under the impression that you and the LibDems were in charge, so why is this a Labour scheme? They may have proposed it when they were in charge, but were you not elected on a manifesto of change?

    So more money down the drain on failed road schemes, while our buses remain very expensive and a minute investment in bicycle facilities. A recipe for disaster.

    This makes even Howard Thomas seem sensible.

    Comment by Adrian Windisch | September 21, 2010 | Reply

    • Adrian – have you not read any of the reporting of this scheme over the last few months!?!?

      The contract was let and the works started under Labour’s control and before we took over. Under those circumstances it is very difficult or impossible just to stop the scheme as people wanted.

      Glib comments from you and Howard Thomas don’t change the facts.

      Comment by Richard Willis | September 21, 2010 | Reply

  8. Unfortunately Richard the fact remains that you failed to vote against this madcap scheme when you had the chance in opposition, and now it seems that the 3 local councillors were offered the chance by Cllr Page to pull the plug on it, but didn’t take up his offer.

    Did you read the letter in last week’s paper from a bus user who said that some of his fellow passengers were stopping using the bus to get into their cars and take longer, but quicker , routes to work. I’m sure this wasn’t what RBC had in mind as a result of this scheme!

    Comment by Howard Thomas | September 22, 2010 | Reply

  9. You were voted in to change things. Blaming Lab or saying its difficult is like saying you cant cope.

    If you were not in power you woyld be saying this was another disaster in a long series of messes. Have the courage to dp what you promised before the election.

    Comment by Adrian windisch | September 22, 2010 | Reply

    • Adrian – such a silly comment is realy disappointing coming from you! I have said that this is not a scheme I would have implemented had it come forward while I was in charge but it was signed off and let BEFORE the Conservative and Lib Dem administration took office. WHat precisely are you accusing me of not doing that I promised to do? I am busily implementing the Conservative and Lib Dem transport manifestos.

      I suggest that if the Greens wish to be taken seriously you resume your previous constructive opposition and stop parroting Labour’s tired lines and providing them with cover for decisions they took while in office.

      Comment by Richard Willis | September 22, 2010 | Reply

  10. I agree that Labours transport policy was a disaster. The difference between us seems to be that I want to change it.

    Many voters thought you were going to change transport and will be disapointed. You promised less traffic lights and more roundabouts. So far We have seen more traffic lights! I woukd spend less on roads more on public transport, cycling and walking facilities.

    You saying this means I support Labour is silly.

    Comment by Adrian windisch | September 22, 2010 | Reply

    • Adrian – your statement is so completely untrue that I can only assume you have been out of the country for the last few months!!!

      I stopped the proposal for new traffic lights at TGI and Caversham Bridge roundabouts and have instituted a borough-wide review of all traffic lighted junctions. Do you think Labour would have done either of these? The first 20 junctions identified for possible traffic light removal have been publish and they include some very important junctions.

      I have had cycle parking increased at several locations already with many more to follow. The first on-carriageway cycle lanes have been introduced on Peppard Road, with more to follow. I have published a tree strategy designed to increase Reading’s coverage by 10% despite the necessary felling of some diseased trees which will need to be replaced.

      In just four months we have begun to radically change Labour’s priorities and there are many more announcements in the pipeline.

      You always used to strike me as a reasonable chap but I am amazed at your comments on here and the very pro-Labour/anti-Coalition stance being adopted by Rob White in the Council. I suggest that you adopt a more constructive stance suggesting the positive things you want to see done and I am sure you will get a sympathetic hearing. Just sniping based on inaccurate statements will win you no friends nor advance your agenda!

      Comment by Richard Willis | September 22, 2010 | Reply

  11. Labour were always having reviews, so far you seem to be following in their footsteps.

    If we do get any more cycle provision then well done, Labour were always promising them as well. But you seem to be be intent on spending large sums on traffic schemes, much like Labour.

    I have not been away this year, but I have been busy with work though. And as I no longer live in RBC (I moved to Earley last year) I follow their news a little less than before.

    Comment by Adrian Windisch | September 22, 2010 | Reply

    • Adrian – could you specify large sums I have spent on traffic schemes???

      Do you seriously think you can just rip out traffic lights without safety audit and considering the needs of pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other road users? I am truly surprised at your implication. Of course you have to review each of the junctions. Not to do so could lead to legal challenge if someone was injured following any changes and possible prosecution for negligence.

      I suggest you judge this adminstration after a few more months when the fruits will become more apparent. At the moment you are not proposing anything positive and are leaping to premature judgements!

      Comment by Richard Willis | September 22, 2010 | Reply

  12. Richard, there is no point arguing with an idiot. They will wear you down with their persistance and defeat you with their experience.

    Comment by Doodlebug | September 23, 2010 | Reply

  13. With ref to your question “where would you suggest the money came from to widen the carriageway etc?”………….according to RBC’s website …… work will start immediately to re-widen part of the carriageway.
    Obviously some has been discovered lying in a dormant vault somewhere in the Civic centre !
    Well done Cllr for bringing forward the review.
    Please make sure that you and the council listen to the public this time , and the residents around this area in particular.
    This mess needs to be sorted out asap. Can you imagine the public outcry if a child is knocked down by a so called ‘rat running ‘ vehicle in Northumberland Ave? or anywhere else for that matter!

    Comment by Howard Thomas | September 25, 2010 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers