Richard Willis's Blog

First for local news and first for comment

Labour’s Equivocal Response to the Woolas Lies and Smears

It has been interesting to follow the Labour response to one of their own front-benchers being found guilty in a court of smearing his Lib Dem opponent with lies that amounted to stirring up racial tensions. From the national party the response has been mixed. The new Leader Ed Miliband, who appointed Woolas to his front bench as immigration spokesman, has been quite muted. By contrast Labour’s Deputy Leader Harriet Harman has condemned Woolas strongly and stated that even if he were to appeal and win there would be no way back for him to Labour’s highest ranks.

However, Harman’s view is clearly not shared by many of her MP colleagues. The Labour MP for Broughton and Blackley, Graham Stringer is standing by Phil. He said he was ‘disappointed and surprised’ at Harman’s comments and the suspension. He added: “Phil is appealing this decision and I don’t understand why he is being hung out to dry. If Phil was accused of telling untruths in the last General Election to get elected I am sure he was not on his own.” So that’s alright then! According to Stringer one of Woolas’s defences is that others were doing the same. Perhaps he would care to name such offenders.

Another senior Labour source, who did not wish to be named, said: “I’m flabbergasted. This is outrageous and will upset a lot of people. Phil led a robust campaign. He has an outstanding record as a politician and should not have been treated like this.”  Again in the eyes of this MP, leading a robust campaign and having “an outstanding record” justifies smears and lies that sought to stir up racial tensions to secure election. It is a vivid demonstration of the thinking on the Labour benches at present.

The defence of Woolas contrasts sharply with the comments on this blog by Jonny Morris, former Labour Councillor in Reading who describes Woolas thus, “The man has always been dodgy, bordering on racist to gain electoral advantage, and now it seems he is also a liar.” If only the rest of the Labour party shared Jonny’s view and was prepared to condemn the man in such forthright terms.

It will be interesting to see if the Reading Labour Party expresses any view on the case and what impact it will have on their campaigning tactics. So far the evidence is not encouraging!

Advertisements

November 7, 2010 - Posted by | National

4 Comments »

  1. Very interesting! I have linked to this post as I think it contains some fascinating quotes and raises not a few questions about Labour’s (variable) attitudes.

    Comment by Right Friendly | November 7, 2010 | Reply

  2. I have no doubt that cllr Lovelock will be supportive of Woolas. After all, she herself publicly made unsubstantiated, slanderous allegations against an ex-labour colleague when after a year’s break he stood for the Conservatives. Her action managed to outrage even some of her own Reading labour group!

    Comment by Tracy Clark | November 7, 2010 | Reply

  3. just about the only domestic intervention made by Mr Martin Salter since he went into exile was in Woolas’ local paper, in support of Woolas.

    Comment by janestheone | November 8, 2010 | Reply

  4. Jane Griffith has done a good job,over the years,of drawing attention to the organised campaign of smear conducted against her,and others,by Salter,Powers etc.Viciousness appears to run thru Reading Labor Party like a virus in the blood stream…

    Comment by Emily | November 8, 2010 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: