Richard Willis's Blog

First for local news and first for comment

Both Reading Constituencies Unchanged in Boundary Review

The Electoral Commission has been undertaking a review of the boundaries of Parliamentary constituencies to take effect at the next General Election. The review is taking into account the Government’s policy of reducing the number of MPs in the House of Commons from the present 650 to 600 and in so doing reducing the cost of Government. The review will also ensure fairer representation by reducing the differences in the size of electorates which currently heavily favours the Labour party who tend to have more small constituencies in cities, and also Scotland and Wales. The proposed cut in constituency number will impact heavily impact on Wales which is set to lose a quarter of its seats, falling from 40 to 30 following the establishment of the Welsh Assembly. All new constituencies should have around 76,500 electors +/-5%.

Previous rules which prevented constituencies crossing County boundaries have been scrapped meaning that some radically new constituencies may be created. The Commission’s initial report has now entered the public domain with its detailed recommendations for England. I was not expecting much change in Reading due to both constituencies being close to the target size but it was always possible that changes elsewhere could have an unexpected knock on effect.

The Electoral Commission proposes the following for Berkshire:

“30. There are currently eight constituencies in this county. We are proposing no change to the number of constituencies. Of the existing constituencies, six have electorates within 5% of the electoral quota. Of the remaining two constituencies, Slough is above the 5% limit and Windsor is below it.

31. We propose to keep unaltered all six constituencies that are within the 5% electoral quota (Bracknell, Maidenhead, Newbury, Reading East, Reading West, and Wokingham).

32. In order to reduce the large electorate of the Slough constituency and to increase the electorate of the neighbouring Windsor constituency, we propose to transfer the Foxborough ward of the Borough of Slough to our proposed Windsor constituency. We note that the neighbouring ward of the Borough of Slough, Colnbrook with Poyle, is already in the existing Windsor constituency. Apart from this one alteration, we propose no further changes.”

Nationally only 77 constituencies remain unchanged and six of them are in Berkshire! There is still a long way to go before the proposals become law and they will probably face some stiff resistance from the Labour party along the way but for the Berkshire MPs this can only be good news.


September 13, 2011 - Posted by | Local


  1. We are not so pleased in Yorkshire.
    Calder Valley would be extended over the top of the moors into Worth Valley, Bronte Country where the MP lives.. Keighley & Ilkley would then be compensated by taking in Bingley from Shipley.
    Davies MP is very cross as Shipley would disappear as a name, with its long traditions of excellent Mp like Marcus Fox.
    We in Halifax would be better off and even our Labour MP admits it was expected to take in one of CV Wards [ where we have 2 of the 3 councillors, the other an independent ]

    But the main complaints are that it has been done just on numbers with very little concern for local community links. An example being Skipton & Ripon with some distant rural parts of William Hagues Richmond added in just to increase the numbers
    OH wll we shall have to go to the Consultations with better proposals.

    Comment by Mark Andrew | September 13, 2011 | Reply

  2. I don’t like this redistribution! I’m glad the the Berkshire seats remain as is with the exception of small one ward adjustment between Slough and Windsor but tolerances were made too tight at +/- 5% and it was silly to scrap the riule preventing crossing County Boundaries. Some very weird constituencies being created where there are no community ties between the parts thereof. I do hope the equally time wasting, de-stabilising and expensive idea to have such a redistribution every five years is scrapped. People, be they Political Activists, MPs or ordinary voters, won’t know where they are as seats keep changing. Hopefully that idea will be dropped and we can have a redistribution every TEN years say two years after each Census when up to date data should be available. I have no problem with re-distribution of seats to take account of population movements but this particular one gives the impression of being rushed and having been given the answer beforehand and reverse engineered.

    Comment by Steve Foley | September 13, 2011 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: